We've all heard those grumblings in the pews about the use of technology and whether it is more of a distraction in the sanctuary of God or a welcomed aid to worshippers trying to communicate in a new language. Regardless of how you feel about technology in worship, the facts speak for themselves. Churches continue to lose members who no longer believe it speaks their language and has little relevance to their lives outside Sunday morning. Relevance [noun] - practical and especially social applicability In an age of iPods, cellphones, digital cameras, laptops, gameboys, and internet chat rooms, the church has been slow to embrace change. Is this the same church proclaiming that the only way to true freedom and peace is through change [repentance] and transformation?

Does anyone see a blatant disconnect here?

USA Today has an interesting article discussing the growing use of media and technology by the church. Much of it can be summed up with the following excerpt: Critics rue the potential of bells and Whistler-like video images to distract from the deeper meaning of church. But as the techno-worship trend matures, users say it's serving a profound purpose: turning sideline sitters into active church participants, cultivating compassion, and making it easier for the taciturn to tell inspiring stories. The article also quotes some statistics from The Barna Group's September 2005 report on churches using technology. Noteworthy statistics from that report include: 62% of Protestant churches presently use a large-screen projection system in their communications 62% of churches incorporate live drama into worship services 61% of Protestant churches integrate video content into their worship services 57% of Protestant churches now have a website. 56% of churches now rely on email blasts for reaching their church members 12% of churches offer EFT (Electronic Funds Transfer) as a means of donating money to the church USA Today's article debates whether this growing use of technology in churches is good or bad. The answer is both. If we use technology for technology's sake, it is a bad decision that will most likely distract people from your message. However, if your church uses technology as a means to enhance the message or to attract or reach more people, than it is a good use of technology. One thing is certain - technology is becoming an essential part in reaching people with the gospel today. Your church better learn how to use it in a good way. Why do we use technology at First United Methodist Church?
Email Subscription:

Related posts:

On the Cutting Edge of Ministry Marketing in the Church Missional Church…Simple Church Paradigm: Health Club Model